Yesterday, the Finger Lakes Timesreported that Mark Gearan, former president of Hobart and William Smith Colleges (1999-2017), will return to succeed President Joyce Jacobsen, who "resigned" on Monday, July 25th to become a faculty member in the Economics department. Having gone through the "reassignment" process myself, I can empathize with President Jacobsen. This was a decision foisted on her by the Board of Trustees who think we are credulous enough to swallow wholeheartedly the "she resigned" spiel they are spoon-feeding us. She was "resigned" to the position of faculty member. I doubt this was entirely her own decision.
There have been rumors about the state of the Colleges and the appointment of Mr. Gearan makes sense. He is adept at fostering strong relations with the community (a building and a street were named after him), he excels at fundraising and he can hobnob with the best of them, having enticed former President Bill Clinton to visit the campus years ago. Although it has only been five years since he left the campus, Gearan will find that the landscape has changed. Using Finger Lakes vernacular, the Colleges are like a sailboat that has become rudderless amidst the changing political winds. It appears that Hobart and William Smith Colleges does not know what direction to take. Gearan built up the administration at the Colleges, but will he now do the same for academics?
More importantly, Gearan is going to have to be very proactive in repairing the relationship with the community of Geneva. Two Hobart and William Smith professors, Jody Dean and Hannah Dickinson have assumed antagonistic roles within the community. Dean openly called for the burning down of all police departments while Dickinson has been very vocal in her support of an inflammatory Geneva City Council member. Dean is no stranger to controversy. She made an appearance in Kurt Anderson's book Fantasyland in which the author chastises her for her promotion of a fantasy industrial complex. Dean, especially, has antagonized the community and one of the first things Gearan will have to do is to remind her of her obligation to teach students, conduct research and form part of the Geneva community.
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens spoke at HWS in April 2022
Many small colleges these days are struggling with enrollment and Gearan will find this to be at the top of his list of priorities. It has been said that HWS has seen a drastic decrease in the number of applicants and Jacobsen herself, when we spoke to her last summer, acknowledged the severity of the issue.
It would be devastating to see Hobart and William Smith Colleges close down. I doubt that would happen, but Mark Gearan would only be returning if the situation at the Colleges is much more dire than has been let on.
In the three years that Jacobsen was at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, she never seemed to make an effort to become acquainted with the community and it was not clear what exactly her academic vision for the Colleges was. Mark Gearan has a track record of success at the Colleges and established and maintained cordial if not solid relationships with the community of Geneva. He has a very tall order in front of him, but I believe he is the person that Hobart and William Smith Colleges need right now.
If you have not been following Jeopardy for the last ten days, you have missed an amazing display of talent and democracy. Ryan Long hails from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and after becoming Jeopardy champion on May 13th, he has held steady thwarting all attempts to dethrone him. His winning streak is now at 11 games.
Ryan Long
What makes Ryan's run so impressive? His profile doesn't fit what the "stereotypical" image many people have of someone who displays a strong intellect. Many contestants on Jeopardy are professors, lawyers, computer programmers, etc. These and many other positions are associated with intelligence and and high-cognitive skills. But Ryan goes against that perception. He is a rideshare driver. Sadly, we live in a society where people dismiss participants in the gig economy as not being "smart enough." Historian Richard Hofstatder observed that for many Americans, "Intellect is resented as a form of power or privilege." The vast number of "reality tv programs" on the air now seems to prove this. Ryan shows that anyone outside of that circle can possess, display and apply intellect. I wrote earlier this year about a wonderful program that highlights the artistic talent of airport workers in the Fort Lauderdale, Florida airport. It is wonderful to see that talent is celebrated in all facets of American society. We need to do much more of it.
I am rooting for him as it is nice to see that someone from outside of academe can display an intellect that far too many people associate with a certain sector of the professional landscape.
In her 2007 book The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein, assails the predatory behavior of capitalist leaders who swoop in after a natural or man-made disaster to set their plans in motion while the local population is reeling in a state of shock or the government is distracted. Examining cases from Iraq to Chile to Indonesia she deftly illustrates how individuals and corporations took advantage of the shock of a Gotterdämmerung to strike while the iron is hot and impose their ideas and profit-making aspirations while there is minimal resistance.
Although it has been 15 yeas since the publication of that book, a residue of Klein's message remains. There will always be someone who will try to take advantage of an adverse situation to make a profit.
The first appearance of Covid-19 in 2020 wreaked havoc on all professions and remade how we envisioned work. Indeed, it launched an era of per ardua ad astra thinking that many of us have struggled to navigate through. But others saw an opportunity.
Intrepideur (n)-an individual or company who with little or no fear or
experience seeks to migrate their business to a sector normally not affiliated
with their line of business or area of expertise.
Intrepideur combines "intrepid" and "entrepreneur" to identify individuals or organizations that attempt something new while downplaying the expertise and knowledge of the people who work in the sector they are cavalierly encroaching upon. This individual is intrepid for taking such a bold move, albeit with little experience. The entrepreneurial aspect lies in the innovative vision that is being applied. But does it mean it is the right move for the company or the new clients to which it seeks to work with?
Only time will tell. Until then we have a new descriptor for a new breed of innovators.
On February 11th I was preparing to fly from Fort Lauderdale to JFK in New York. As I made my way from one end of the airport to my gate I came across a fascinating display in a passageway extension between two different gates. Under the wall display heading "I bet you didn't know! FLL Employee Art Exhibition" were a number of paintings, photographs and sketches created by the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport staff. Every piece of work was stunning in its originality, breadth and talent. Of course, most passengers just speedily walked by, completely oblivious to what was right in front of them. Several of us stopped to admire the work and we all took photographs of the pieces we liked best. Each painting, drawing, etc., included a biography of the artist and a QR code that led visitors to the Broward Public Art & Design website.
The talent and skill of the featured FLL employees was clearly visible and I think this idea is wonderful. Here are photos of two of the posted works that I liked the most.
Work by Luis Merida
The work to the left was done by Luis Merida and is a pencil depiction of the Palacio Nacional de Guatemala. This is free hand drawing! Can you believe it! You may contact the artist directly via email at: meridaus@gmail.com.
The painting below grabbed my attention because of the mix of colors and the movement that I perceived. The artist, Michelle Galli, works as a flight attendant for Spirit Airlines and titles her work "Barrier Reef". She is very adept at using acrylic on canvas. You may reach her at: GCFluidart@gmail.com. If you would like to learn more about this fascinating and original program email ARTFLL@broward.org. There were numerous other employees who created highly original and engaging pieces of art. I just wish more travelers would take a moment to appreciate its.
The next time you scurry about in an airport, take a moment to look around you. There are some wonderfully talented individuals out there and if we are too busy with work, travel, etc., we will miss the great work that they do.
Filmmakers or any other artist trying to redress cultural shortcomings in past iconoclastic works of art face an uphill battle in the ever so slippery slope of political correctness and presentism. Steven Spielberg's latest effort, an updated retelling of the classic "West Side Story" is no exception even though the veteran director went out of the way to make sure that the cultural portrayal was accurate. He and his team went to Puerto Rico for consultation with historian, cultural experts and community members, and they asked the Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College to advise them on their production so that they could get the cultural nuances right. Once the film was released, the very consultant from Hunter College wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Times (Dec. 15, 2021) that slammed the film, discarding it as a "a remake that we didn't need." How about that? Spielberg and his team went to her for advice, which we can only assume she provided, and then she takes a shot at the final product.
Scene from "West Side Story"(2021) Source: aldianews.com
Her descent from PC Egalitarianism to PC Authoritarianism (terms coined by the conservative critic Jordan Peterson; PC Egalitarianism strives to establish equity and fairness for all; PC Authoritarianism uses victimhood to push an agenda and steamroll criticism or opponents) begins with the very first sentence she writes: "I have to confess that I never saw the original 'West Side Story.'" This is surprising since as a professor of Anthropology she would be expected to contrast and compare different events, objects, people, etc. How can she claim to take an unbiased approach if she has not seen the original film? For me, this debunks any credibility she tries to project throughout the rest of her essay and allows her allegedly analytic view to be contaminated by her own political beliefs. The French philosopher Frédéric Gros once wrote that, "We are shackled by our judgements," and it appears that as an anthropologist Yarimar Bonilla has not been able to extricate herself from these invisible constraints.
Bonilla argues that, "The film is littered with symbols
of Puerto Rico’s nationalist movements, but there is no recognition of how
people who embraced these symbols have long been surveilled and criminalized by
the federal and Puerto Rican governments. There is a particular irony to the
scene in which the Sharks are singing the Puerto Rican revolutionary anthem as
they walk away from the police. As the cultural critic Frances Negrón Muntaner
has argued, in real life such an act would have likely landed
them under F.B.I. surveillance." These are fair points and ones that most
Americans may be unaware of, but is "West Side Story" the proper
place to exhibit these elements? Bonilla seems to forget that "West Side
Story" is a retelling of "Romeo and Juliet", but within a Puerto
Rican community in New York City in the 1950s. Her presentist approach would
like to turn the narrative from love story to political docu-drama. Any
director would have to greatly extend the length of the production to include
this. Bonilla assumes too much when she says that the Sharks would have been
arrested for singing the Prerto Rican revolutionary anthem. This would only
happened if the police understand the lyrics. For them, it probably sounded
just like a song that young people sing. There really is no place for this
"reasoning" in "West Side Story". If her version of "West Side Story" were to include this, then she would also have to mention the 1954 shooting during the US Congress session by four members of the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party. By then, no vestige of the original "West Side Story" would remain.
Members of Puerto Rican Nationalist Party in 1954. Source: USA Today and AP
The issue of language comes up in Bonilla's disquisition.
She assails Spielberg's decision to not include English subtitles when the
Sharks sing the Puerto Rican revolutionary anthem, saying that many Puerto
Ricans do not speak Spanish and would not understand as a counter to
Spielberg's assertion that he did not want to give English more power overSpanish. Bonilla attacks Spielberg's overall "imperialist" approach with "West Side
Story", but uses an imperialist lens in her criticism of the exclusion of English subtitles. She points out
the perceived pejorative nature of the word "prieta"--which is a
descriptor for someone who is dark skinned. Recall that this controversy was
stirred up with the summer release of "In the Heights", which also
took place in a Hispanic neighborhood in New York City. "Prieta" is
not necessarily a derogatory term. I have lived in Cuba for seven years and it
is used frequently to describe someone. I am surprised that someone who claims
to be an anthropologist would fail to consider the diversity
of the Spanish language and its culture regarding this word.
Bonilla complains that , "The over-accented Spanish, coaxed out of U.S.-born actors by dialect coaches, ultimately becomes a kind of linguistic brownface, providing little more than a façade of authenticity as thick and corny as the brown makeup worn by the actors in the original version." Sure, you can see her point, but if she did not see the original film, how can she refer to it? Dialect coaches often are called in for dialog, etc. Americans have to learn British inflections and intonations and vice versa. I was born to a Bolivian mother and while I speak Spanish, it is with an accent. It took me a long time to come to terms with that, but I have accepted it and embraced it. There is no real issue with the "over-accented Spanish" to anyone other than Bonilla.
I do not dismiss the point that Bonilla makes, but if she
really wants "The mood, the tone, the feeling and the message of a
historical text to resonate with the audiences for which it is intended,"
then she should produce a documentary, not dismantle a musical centered on
romance.
Gros wrote that, "One needs to be unconstrained to
think far." Unfortunately, Bonilla cannot see beyond her own philosophical
and political blinders to truly asses "West Side Story".
Today Goodreads.com published its nominations for "Book of the Year 2021". As an avid read, especially of history and biographies, I immediately went to see the books nominated in the category of "Best History & Biography" hoping to find Ada Ferrer's excellent Cuba: An American History in it. I was stunned not to see it there. More surprising, I saw Malcolm Gladwell's "The Bomber Mafia" included in the list. Gladwell is a very well respected observer of pop culture and noted pundit of social phenomena, but I am surprised his latest effort would be included in the history catalog. Granted his topic is historical (he discussed the role of technology during World War II), but his formal background isn't in history.
Ferrer, on the other hand, is a recognized and highly acclaimed historian who teaches at New York University. Check out a recent interview she gave here.
For me, Ferrer's effort sits alongside Paul Preston's magnum opus Franco: A Biography. Her narrative is excellent and instructive and she deftly avoids oversaturation of facts, names and citations. Her pace is very easy for the casual reader. I lived in Cuba for seven years and have a strong grasp of Cuban history, but I still learned a lot from Ferrer's book.
So why didn't her book make the Goodreads.com "Best Books of 2021" list? I think part of the issue is that people, in general, do not read history as much as they used to. Any author whose thesis tangentially includes history, will be considered "history". But for me, the real issue is that many Americans are not that familiar with Cuban history, informing their knowledge of that country by propaganda foisted on the public by the Cuban exile community in Miami. It is not an exaggeration to say that for many Americans, Cuban history began in 1959. Many Americans know who Fidel Castro and Che Guevara are. But very few know who Gerardo Machado, Ramon Grau San Martín, Frank País, Salvador García Agüero, Antonio Maceo and José Martí were. Ferrer addresses this when she writes, "People interested in Cuba make the mistake of thinking too much about Fidel Castro." Referring to how Castro survived his incarceration, she adds, "Fidel received his freedom, thanks to civic activists, many of whose names have bee lost to history." But where Ferrer really succeeds in her masterly work is displaying the US relationship with Cuba that extends to before the creation of the North American country. American conception of Cuba is formulated on two poles: 1) it is communist; 2) it is a victim of American imperialism. Until now, not much attention has been given to its relationship with the US, especially around slavery and sugar mill ownership (US senator James DeWolf owned a sugar mill and slaves in Cuba in the early part of the 19th century); or the progressive elements that briefly entered government in 1933.
I like the depth of Ferrer's research and her writing easily transmits a wealth of historical information to the reader. It is unfortunate that Goodreads.com deemed Cuba: An American History unworthy of inclusion in the list of best books of 2021.
The historian Arnold Toynbee, in a 1947 article for The New York Times, posed the following question, "Are we asking whether history is governed by inviolable laws, which have not only taken effect in every past case to which they have applied, but are also bound to take effect in every similar situation that may arise in the future?"
A Norwegian and an American are, unwittingly, putting that thesis to the test. Ole Gunnar Solskjaer has managed Manchester United since 2018, arriving with the accolades that he received as a player for that team. From 1996-2007 Solskjaer scored 126 goals in 366 matches for the Red Devisl. In 1999 his last-minute goald in the UEFA Champions League final lifted Manchester United over Bayern Munich, cementing his legacy with his team's fans. After retiring in 2007, Solskjaer managed Molde, a team in his native Norway and Cardiff in Wales, before being appointed interim manager of Manchester United in 2018. He signed a three-year extension on July 24, 2021.
Across the pond, Aaron Boone, was named manager of the New York Yankees on December 4, 2017. Boone's claim to fame for Yankees fans occurred on October 16, 2003 when he it a game-winning home run off of Time Wakefield of the rival Boston Red Sox to win the series and propel the Yankees into the World Series. Like Solskjaer's late-minute goal against Bayern Munich, this became Boone's signature moment. Unlike Solskjaer, Boone had no managerial experience when was selected to be Yankees manager.
Bitter Rivals Get the Last Laugh
Source: Peter Powell/EPA, via Shutterstock
This month both managers suffered humiliating defeats at the
hands of their most-hated rivals: Liverpool for Manchester United and the Red
sox for the Yankees. On October 5th the Boston Red Sox ended the Yankees'
playoff hopes with a resounding 6-2 victory at Boston and on October 24th
Manchester United were bludgeoned by Liverpool 5-0 in their own stadium--Old
Trafford, known as the "Theater of Dreams". Liverpool rewrote the
script into a "Theater of Nightmares". How bad did it become for
Solskjaer? As the game for Manchester United progressed from "extremely
poor" to "catastrophic", Liverpool fans sarcastically serenaded
Solskjaer by singing "Ole's
at the Wheel". They were not going to let him forget that he was at
the help of the car wreck that played itself out before his very eyes.
In Boston following the Yankees' defeat, fan chanted "YankeesSuck", this has become a tradition over the years. But the Liverpool
fans showed more creativity, spirit, and let's be honest, rhythm in their
"homage" to Solskjaer. The "Yankees Suck" chant sounds cultish in its repetition. Neither Boone nor Solskjaer seemed visibly
affected by the derisive chants that rained down upon them. Perhaps this
ability to shake off negative comments is a strength of their personality. But
does that make them good managers?
Boone has been soundly criticized for having been hired despite
having no managerial experience. Even with his past efforts leading Molde and
Cardiff, Solskjaer has been hammered in the press and social media world for
not coming close to the level of top coaches such as Jurgen Klopp (Liverpool),
Pep Guardiola (Manchester City) and Thomas Tuchel (Chelsea). Boone has
frequently been outmanaged by Alex Cora, manager of the Boston Red Sox.
Solskjaer and Boone have pleasant and calm demeanors. Solskjaer is avuncular
and is comfortable with the press, speaking English as it if were his first
language while Boone is passive but sometimes struggles with his communication
as if English were his second language.
Moving Forward
Over the last few years there has been a tendency to hire relatively young and inexperienced coaches to manage teams. Chelsea hired its
former star player Frank Lampard to manage the team, despite no previous
managerial experience. He was fired earlier this year. In baseball, the
Philadelphia Phillies hired a former player, Gabe Kapler, who had very little
experience. He was fired after one year, although to be fair, he led the San
Francisco Giants to the playoffs this year. Will there be a change in
hiring practices: opting for the hard-nosed, sometimes abrasive leadership
styles over the friendly, laid back and passive style that Solskjaer and Boone
display? Already there are rumors that the Italian coach Antonio Conte is being
considered as a replacement for Solskjaer. Conte is driven, intense and pushes
his players hard, but is a master tactician. The Yankees decided to resign
Boone to a three-year contract not longer after he was outmanaged by Alex Cora
in the wild card. Cora, by the way, has publicly stated his support for Boone
to remain as Yankees manager. Clearly, he enjoys outwitting Boone on the
baseball diamond. Eventually, the Yankees will go back to having a driven and
intense manager such as Billy Martin, who became infamous in 1978 for yelling at his player Reggie
Jackson in the dugout at Boston. But for now, the team prefers to have a
milquetoast running the team. If only we could get someone similar to this guy
(below) to manage the Yankees!
Life Imitates Art
In his 1928 book Man Who Knew Coolidge, Sinclair Lewis
imbues one of his characters with a wild imagination. In sharing the novel he
would like to someday write, the character describes the plot where an American
marries a princess in Wales and convinces her to leave the royal family and return
with him to the US. It is almost as if he predicted the decision by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to leave England and live in the US. This has nothing to do with Manchester United or the Yankees; I just like seeing how sometimes historical/fantastical ideas come true.
The Yankees and Manchester United have grand histories and
traditions. But they also have bitter rivals which make those trophies shine
with such a bright sheen. Nowadays, the tables have turned and the hated rivals
are at the top of their game and the Yankees and Manchester United must adapt
and improve. While the Yankees have consigned themselves and their fans to
three more years of stultified baseball, Manchester United have yet to make a
decision, keeping their fans on edge as to what direction the team will go
in.
"History is an endless conversation," observed the
literary critic Ken Burke years ago. Right now that conversation is one-sided
and Liverpool and the Red Sox are talking the loudest.
